Access glowbeautymag.com. Glow Beauty Magazine

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

glowbeautymag.com

64 ms

ZKlIR4a8j3sbzrgvQMYI9qpKS5rwIilzHRSYLZpPflbfelSffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9UwhjowRShZQsKwe4y52StjcbXw2FywsTTZhUzih48jWmXpAuyZkoRdhXCiaiaOciCdaiKZABuiY8ljAS0jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUXdhXlde8Xih80O1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdP37O1szdPuC-Wsa-At0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicI7fbKnMsMMeMI6MKG4fH3gIMMjfkMfH6qJtKGbMg62JMJ7fbRRHyMMeMX6MKG4fHvgIMMjgfMfH6qJCMIbMg65JMJ7f6K3UMIbMg6BJMJ7f6KUUMIbMg6VJMJ7fbKlMsMMeMj6MKG4fHtgIMMjIfMfH6qJK3IbMg6YJMJ7fbKwMsMMegI6MKG4fHqgIMMjffMfH6qJ76IbMg6PJMJ7fbK4MsMMeMq6MKG4fJGgIMMjIkMfqMequFHkgb.js

41 ms

css2

349 ms

legacy.js

21 ms

modern.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Glowbeautymag.com, 31% (17 requests) were made to Siterics.com and 31% (17 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (858 ms) relates to the external source Siterics.com.

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Glowbeautymag.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 42.6 kB

Original 54.2 kB
After minification 50.6 kB
After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

Original 117.9 kB
After minification 111.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glow Beauty Mag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 469.4 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB
After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 469.4 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 23 B

Original 870 B
After minification 870 B
After compression 847 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glowbeautymag.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glow Beauty Mag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.