Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

golfcourseranking.com

Golf Rankings | Golf Course Ratings and Reviews for Golfers in USA & Canada.

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

200 ms

About Website

Welcome to golfcourseranking.com homepage info - get ready to check Golf Course Ranking best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about golfcourseranking.com

Find golf course ratings,golf courses near me,golf reviews,golf course descriptions,golf architect profiles,golf tips and golf videos and rules of golf quizzes.

Visit golfcourseranking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Golfcourseranking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

golfcourseranking.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

golfcourseranking.com

172 ms

www.golfcourseranking.com

137 ms

www.golfcourseranking.com

132 ms

foretee.com

97 ms

047ed6342330e01e.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Golfcourseranking.com, 91% (30 requests) were made to Foretee.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) relates to the external source Foretee.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.6 kB (19%)

Content Size

147.8 kB

After Optimization

119.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Golfcourseranking.com main page is 147.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 112.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

  • Original 35.5 kB
  • After minification 35.5 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 112.3 kB
  • After minification 112.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Golf Course Ranking images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (48%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Golf Course Ranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

golfcourseranking.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

golfcourseranking.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

golfcourseranking.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Golfcourseranking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Golfcourseranking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Golf Course Ranking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: