Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

goodzoom.ru

goodzoom.ru

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

631 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

298 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Goodzoom content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goodzoom.ru

goodzoom.ru - can become your!

Visit goodzoom.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodzoom.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 631 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodzoom.ru performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hamsterkombat-official.site

631 ms

styles.css

241 ms

hamster-coin.png

598 ms

6.png

655 ms

2.png

534 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Goodzoom.ru, 9% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (943 ms) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

490.3 kB

After Optimization

469.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Goodzoom.ru main page is 490.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 359.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 20.2 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 430 B

  • Original 359.4 kB
  • After minification 359.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goodzoom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 85.2 kB
  • After compression 85.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodzoom.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodzoom. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

goodzoom.ru accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

goodzoom.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

goodzoom.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodzoom.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goodzoom.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Goodzoom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: