Access goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com

109 ms

141 ms

jquery.js

21 ms

reset.css

15 ms

common.css

498 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com.

Content Size

384.7 kB

After Optimization

302.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com main page is 384.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 246.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

Original 8.1 kB
After minification 7.4 kB
After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 80 B

Original 246.7 kB
After minification 246.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 59.2 kB

Original 108.5 kB
After minification 108.5 kB
After compression 49.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

Original 21.4 kB
After minification 18.5 kB
After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

robots.txt is not valid

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

N/A
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: