Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

gospelscoop.com

新2足球网址_新宝投注网_新2足球网址_新2博彩_皇冠信用盘_新宝博彩_新2客服_皇冠信用网_新宝足球_新2体育

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

740 ms

Resources Loaded

7.7 sec

Page Rendered

454 ms

About Website

Visit gospelscoop.com now to see the best up-to-date Gospelscoop content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gospelscoop.com

新2足球网址专业为您打造最新新宝投注网,新2足球网址,新2博彩,皇冠信用盘,新宝博彩,新2客服,皇冠信用网,新宝足球,新2体育平台网站

Visit gospelscoop.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gospelscoop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 740 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gospelscoop.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gospelscoop.com

740 ms

www.gospelscoop.com

1246 ms

style.css

234 ms

swiper.min.css

465 ms

animate.min.css

658 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Gospelscoop.com, 46% (16 requests) were made to Hg86a.com and 3% (1 request) were made to 9xp89qof7r.hg86a.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source 9xp89qof7r.hg86a.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.6 kB (18%)

Content Size

404.3 kB

After Optimization

330.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gospelscoop.com main page is 404.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 203.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 31.6 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 203.9 kB
  • After minification 202.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gospelscoop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 97.7 kB
  • After minification 97.7 kB
  • After compression 85.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 35.9 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 69.6 kB
  • After compression 34.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gospelscoop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (50%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gospelscoop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

gospelscoop.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gospelscoop.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gospelscoop.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gospelscoop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gospelscoop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gospelscoop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: