Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

gotigerstorage.com

Owl Storage: Home

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gotiger Storage content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gotigerstorage.com

Owl Storage is located in North Columbia, MO. Our storage units are climate-controlled and available to you 24/7.

Visit gotigerstorage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gotigerstorage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gotigerstorage.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,330 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gotigerstorage.com

1154 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

70 ms

style.min.css

148 ms

layerslider.css

151 ms

css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Gotigerstorage.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gotigerstorage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 626.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

676.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gotigerstorage.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 537.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 390.9 kB
  • After minification 358.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gotiger Storage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 310.1 kB

  • Original 537.1 kB
  • After minification 515.1 kB
  • After compression 227.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.1 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 259.2 kB

  • Original 342.9 kB
  • After minification 301.4 kB
  • After compression 83.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gotigerstorage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 259.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (78%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gotiger Storage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

gotigerstorage.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gotigerstorage.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gotigerstorage.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gotigerstorage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gotigerstorage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gotiger Storage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: