Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

gws.com

Intégration de progiciel en assurance | GWS Consulting

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

353 ms

About Website

Visit gws.com now to see the best up-to-date GWS content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gws.com

Conseiller et assister les professionnels de l’assurance (compagnies et courtiers) dans leur projet d’intégration de progiciel, telle est notre vocation.

Visit gws.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gws.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gws.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,120 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.193

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gws.com

199 ms

www.gws.com

564 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

165 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

239 ms

c2b52dea13a9fe9396911100dc133c5b.min.css

574 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Gws.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (743 ms) belongs to the original domain Gws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 695.5 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

490.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Gws.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 714.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-97%

Potential reduce by 692.4 kB

  • Original 714.4 kB
  • After minification 711.7 kB
  • After compression 22.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 692.4 kB or 97% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 471.8 kB
  • After minification 468.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GWS images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (31%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GWS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

gws.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gws.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gws.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gws.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gws.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GWS. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: