Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

remote.geisinger.org

BIG-IP logout page

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

277 ms

Resources Loaded

863 ms

Page Rendered

131 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Remote Geisinger content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about remote.geisinger.org

Visit remote.geisinger.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Remote.geisinger.org page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 994 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remote.geisinger.org performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

my.policy

277 ms

apm.css

238 ms

session_check.js

108 ms

agent_common.js

95 ms

web_host.js

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Remote.geisinger.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (277 ms) relates to the external source Gremote.geisinger.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 233.0 kB (70%)

Content Size

333.2 kB

After Optimization

100.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Remote.geisinger.org main page is 333.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 281.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 21.5 kB

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 28.3 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 191.2 kB

  • Original 281.4 kB
  • After minification 90.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Remote Geisinger needs image optimization as it can save up to 191.2 kB or 68% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 23.3 kB
  • After minification 16.6 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote Geisinger. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

remote.geisinger.org accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

remote.geisinger.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

remote.geisinger.org SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remote.geisinger.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Remote.geisinger.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remote Geisinger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: