Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

haepro.com

Technology Contractor | Winn Enterprises | San Diego

Page Load Speed

779 ms in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

421 ms

Page Rendered

321 ms

About Website

Welcome to haepro.com homepage info - get ready to check Haepro best content right away, or after learning these important things about haepro.com

Elevate your business with Winn Enterprises in San Diego. Discover innovative solutions and drive success. Contact us today to get started!

Visit haepro.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Haepro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 742 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

haepro.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

haepro.com

37 ms

winnenterprises.com

120 ms

qt=q:95

220 ms

1206057353

44 ms

582734391

282 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Haepro.com, 60% (9 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Winnenterprises.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (282 ms) relates to the external source Player.vimeo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 593.2 kB (62%)

Content Size

951.9 kB

After Optimization

358.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Haepro.com main page is 951.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 538.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 230.5 kB

  • Original 262.3 kB
  • After minification 262.3 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 230.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 151.2 kB
  • After minification 151.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Haepro images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 362.8 kB

  • Original 538.4 kB
  • After minification 538.4 kB
  • After compression 175.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 362.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Haepro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

haepro.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

haepro.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

haepro.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Haepro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Haepro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Haepro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: