Access hardscaperesurfacing.com. Beautiful, Durable Terrazzo Flooring & Concrete Overlay

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

hardscaperesurfacing.com

147 ms

wpstyles.css

55 ms

jquery.js

114 ms

jsRollover.js

106 ms

jquery.vegas.min.js

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Hardscaperesurfacing.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Seal-central-northern-western-arizona.bbb.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (264 ms) belongs to the original domain Hardscaperesurfacing.com.

Content Size

418.8 kB

After Optimization

364.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Hardscaperesurfacing.com main page is 418.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 346.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

Original 14.7 kB
After minification 14.2 kB
After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

Original 346.9 kB
After minification 302.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hardscaperesurfacing needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 242 B

Original 56.2 kB
After minification 56.2 kB
After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 158 B

Original 908 B
After minification 908 B
After compression 750 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hardscaperesurfacing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 158 B or 17% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hardscaperesurfacing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.