Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

healthsystemreview.com

Latest Highlights | Payer+Provider's Health System Review

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

857 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

147 ms

About Website

Visit healthsystemreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Health System Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about healthsystemreview.com

The latest news on the healthcare system from the most reputable sources on the payer and provider industries. Learn about issues impacting cost, quality, and access through Health System Review.

Visit healthsystemreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Healthsystemreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 857 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

healthsystemreview.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

healthsystemreview.com

857 ms

style.min.css

9 ms

colorbox.css

5 ms

bootstrap.min.css

16 ms

font-awesome.min.css

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Healthsystemreview.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (857 ms) belongs to the original domain Healthsystemreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 388.9 kB (67%)

Content Size

583.4 kB

After Optimization

194.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Healthsystemreview.com main page is 583.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 302.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 43.9 kB

  • Original 54.9 kB
  • After minification 50.7 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 946 B

  • Original 63.2 kB
  • After minification 62.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Health System Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 97.1 kB

  • Original 162.9 kB
  • After minification 161.8 kB
  • After compression 65.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.1 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 247.0 kB

  • Original 302.4 kB
  • After minification 284.9 kB
  • After compression 55.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Healthsystemreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 247.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (75%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Health System Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

healthsystemreview.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

healthsystemreview.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

healthsystemreview.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Healthsystemreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Healthsystemreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Health System Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: