Access heart.digital. Web Design & Digital Marketing For Small Businesses

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

heart.digital

7039 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

390 ms

ctf-styles.min.css

363 ms

front.min.css

381 ms

js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Heart.digital, 61% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) belongs to the original domain Heart.digital.

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Heart.digital main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

Original 170.3 kB
After minification 169.1 kB
After compression 27.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 73.0 kB

Original 2.9 MB
After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Heart images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

Original 134.4 kB
After minification 131.0 kB
After compression 108.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

Original 22.4 kB
After minification 22.4 kB
After compression 17.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heart.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heart. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.