Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

heartattackfaq.com

What is Bad Cholesterol (LDL-C)?

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

151 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

382 ms

About Website

Welcome to heartattackfaq.com homepage info - get ready to check Heartattackfaq best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about heartattackfaq.com

Learn what LDL-C (bad cholesterol) is, the risks of having a high LDL number, and factors to consider in reducing your LDL.

Visit heartattackfaq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Heartattackfaq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

heartattackfaq.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

heartattackfaq.com

151 ms

www.attackheartdisease.com

519 ms

uc.js

22 ms

lib-bootstrap.css

135 ms

lib-model-popup.css

186 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Heartattackfaq.com, 93% (50 requests) were made to Attackheartdisease.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) relates to the external source Attackheartdisease.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 202.4 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Heartattackfaq.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 28.9 kB

  • Original 35.8 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 149.2 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Heartattackfaq images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 146.1 kB
  • After minification 146.1 kB
  • After compression 129.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 46.4 kB
  • After minification 46.4 kB
  • After compression 39.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heartattackfaq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (34%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heartattackfaq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

heartattackfaq.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

heartattackfaq.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

heartattackfaq.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heartattackfaq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Heartattackfaq.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Heartattackfaq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: