Access helicalpilebook.com. Helical Pile Book

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

www.helicalpilebook.com

107 ms

0jurR5mNlxvh6VtORiVQ4osUrHa8fVnIhx0UTvYy9YjfeltIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWDjDZ2bDFQbXFR8KZRjaw2yRFebDZc9kjy7zMkG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0-AFzShBGZAskdhtlSem0ieB1dhtlpcTy-koDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCHKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOeBDOcu8Oey8de8RjAU3-AU8jcNz-koRdhXC-AFzShBGZAskdhtlSem0ieB1dhtlpcTy-koDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCdeNRjAUGdaFXOYFUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCiaiaOcBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8ifUaiaS0jWw0dA9CiaiaOcy8de8RjAU3-AU8jcNz-koRdhXCiaiaOc8RdaFy-emqScN0OWg8d1syZhN0OWT7jAC0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaikoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlJ6oC-AoziY83ZPuq-AszifJPjAszjc9lZhBkjAuzdcblSY4zH6GJRObfIMMjgfMfH6GJKdbfIMMjgkMfH6GJK_bfIMMj2KMfH6GJKnbfIMMjIPMfH6qJvDbbMs6IJMJ7fbR3FgMgeMS6MKG4fVJXIMIj2KMfH6qJvQbbMs6sJMHbMp52y-Je.js

74 ms

css2

82 ms

legacy.js

86 ms

modern.js

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Helicalpilebook.com, 33% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 33% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (507 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Helicalpilebook.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 107.9 kB

Original 124.8 kB
After minification 105.8 kB
After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 2.1 MB
After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Helical Pile Book images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 999.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 78 B

Original 9.9 kB
After minification 9.9 kB
After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Helicalpilebook.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Helical Pile Book. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.