Access hiltonmanage.com. Hilton Brands | Global Hospitality Company

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value56.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,840 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.5 s

0/100

10%

hiltonmanage.com

104 ms

72 ms

cb4b483ec0786b28.css

15 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

45 ms

webpack-ddce34d567776c06.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hiltonmanage.com, 64% (18 requests) were made to Hmd-node.go-vip.net and 18% (5 requests) were made to Hmd-wp.go-vip.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (104 ms) belongs to the original domain Hiltonmanage.com.

Content Size

10.0 MB

After Optimization

9.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Hiltonmanage.com main page is 10.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 101.1 kB

Original 124.5 kB
After minification 124.4 kB
After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 205.2 kB

Original 9.8 MB
After minification 9.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hilton Manage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

Original 50.2 kB
After minification 49.7 kB
After compression 20.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21 B

Original 697 B
After minification 697 B
After compression 676 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hiltonmanage.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hilton Manage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.