Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

history.bnpparibas

BNP Paribas Well of History : 2 centuries of banking archives

Page Load Speed

12.9 sec in total

First Response

301 ms

Resources Loaded

12.1 sec

Page Rendered

546 ms

About Website

Welcome to history.bnpparibas homepage info - get ready to check History best content right away, or after learning these important things about history.bnpparibas

Discover 2 centuries of BNP Paribas archives and history by browsing our articles, poscasts, videos, documens, timeline, sliders...

Visit history.bnpparibas

Key Findings

We analyzed History.bnpparibas page load time and found that the first response time was 301 ms and then it took 12.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

history.bnpparibas performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

301 ms

twentytwenty.css

138 ms

admin-ajax.php

3651 ms

style.min.css

117 ms

style-index.css

291 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original History.bnpparibas, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Analyticscom.staging.bnpparibas. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Histoire.bnpparibas.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 635.5 kB (20%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of History.bnpparibas main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 200.3 kB

  • Original 230.2 kB
  • After minification 187.2 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.0 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 435.1 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, History needs image optimization as it can save up to 435.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (60%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of History. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

history.bnpparibas accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

history.bnpparibas best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

history.bnpparibas SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise History.bnpparibas can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that History.bnpparibas main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of History. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: