Access holograph.digital. HOLOGRAPH | Enterprise class connected digital solutions

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,810 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.177

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

holograph.digital

340 ms

holograph.digital

1440 ms

styles.css

478 ms

jquery.min.js

21 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 161 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (117 requests) were addressed to the original Holograph.digital, 19% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Holograph.digital.

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Holograph.digital main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 182.0 kB

Original 208.6 kB
After minification 162.3 kB
After compression 26.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46.3 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 182.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HOLOGRAPH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

Original 431.2 kB
After minification 431.2 kB
After compression 429.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

Original 176.4 kB
After minification 176.4 kB
After compression 175.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Holograph.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

128

After Optimization

The browser has sent 128 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HOLOGRAPH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.