Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

homebeat.live

HomeBeat.Live – HomeBeat.Live – Post mortem

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

300 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

139 ms

About Website

Welcome to homebeat.live homepage info - get ready to check Home Beat best content right away, or after learning these important things about homebeat.live

Visit homebeat.live

Key Findings

We analyzed Homebeat.live page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

homebeat.live performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

homebeat.live

300 ms

homebeat.live

643 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

109 ms

style.min.css

282 ms

style.css

555 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Homebeat.live, 59% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (643 ms) belongs to the original domain Homebeat.live.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 264.5 kB (78%)

Content Size

339.1 kB

After Optimization

74.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Homebeat.live main page is 339.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 248.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 33.9 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Home Beat needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 53.1 kB
  • After minification 51.8 kB
  • After compression 34.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 218.6 kB

  • Original 248.5 kB
  • After minification 220.9 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Homebeat.live needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 218.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (75%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Home Beat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

homebeat.live accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

homebeat.live best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

homebeat.live SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Homebeat.live can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Homebeat.live main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Home Beat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: