Access homeforfoam.com. Supporting the Growth of Foam Recycling

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value23,750 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.6 s

0/100

10%

homeforfoam.com

135 ms

recycling-map

101 ms

muUX-Pw6JJip9DdtzXDcPTqt-9WKdcPJeIu8z3X-Lu6feGwIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWDjkZQmKjhFqFAbtZR48FDItZ2btZ2IkwsnNMKG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0ZWgD-AoqiWFXS1q0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOfG0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8ifUySkolZPU8SYFTdcsuSaskpPozScSCZWgD-AoqiWFXS1q0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCiaiaOcBDOcu8OYiaiko8SYFTdcsuSaskpPozScSCiaiaOcm3Sh80ZYmDiY4oO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPJZdcmuZPuGjABDOAikdas8ShClZe8DSeUypPGHfwKXMyMMeM96MKGHfwkXMyMMeMS6MKGHfwEXMyMMeMq6MKGHfwcXMyMMeMv6MKGHfwhXMyMMegI6MTMgG0xq16j.js

69 ms

css2

80 ms

legacy.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Homeforfoam.com, 27% (11 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (347 ms) relates to the external source Batchgeo.com.

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Homeforfoam.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 112.3 kB

Original 131.7 kB
After minification 109.5 kB
After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

Original 799.8 kB
After minification 796.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Home For Foam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.3 MB
After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

Original 39.5 kB
After minification 39.5 kB
After compression 36.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Homeforfoam.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Home For Foam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.