Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

hopelandwin.com

Professional Fish Feed Extruder

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

879 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

984 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hopelandwin content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hopelandwin.com

Professional Fish Feed Extruder

Visit hopelandwin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hopelandwin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 879 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hopelandwin.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.298

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hopelandwin.com

879 ms

bootstrap.min.css

129 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

121 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

124 ms

themify-icons.css

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Hopelandwin.com, 14% (14 requests) were made to Awt.zoosnet.net and 14% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Awt.zoosnet.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 195.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hopelandwin.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 95.2 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 52.4 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 53.5 kB, which is 50% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.2 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hopelandwin images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 31.1 kB

  • Original 142.6 kB
  • After minification 142.6 kB
  • After compression 111.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 38.9 kB

  • Original 100.3 kB
  • After minification 97.3 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hopelandwin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (52%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hopelandwin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

hopelandwin.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hopelandwin.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hopelandwin.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hopelandwin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hopelandwin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hopelandwin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: