Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

icwt.in

Website Designing | Website Designing Company | ICWT

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

670 ms

About Website

Visit icwt.in now to see the best up-to-date ICWT content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about icwt.in

ICWT is working since 2012 and known as best website designing solutions in india and main cities like Pune , Jaipur , Mumbai , Bhopal , Lucknow , Patna etc.

Visit icwt.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Icwt.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

icwt.in performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

icwt.in

1222 ms

normalize.css

614 ms

fonts.css

617 ms

skeleton.css

618 ms

base.css

1429 ms

Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Icwt.in, 8% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Icwt.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 734.4 kB (38%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Icwt.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 67.9 kB

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 73.0 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 68.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ICWT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 327.2 kB

  • Original 480.5 kB
  • After minification 429.8 kB
  • After compression 153.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 327.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 270.5 kB

  • Original 310.6 kB
  • After minification 254.9 kB
  • After compression 40.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Icwt.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 270.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (47%)

Requests Now

114

After Optimization

60

The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ICWT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

icwt.in accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

icwt.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

icwt.in SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Icwt.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Icwt.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ICWT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: