Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

igm.no

IGM - Kurs konferanser og høgskolestudier idigital kommunikasjon

Page Load Speed

14.7 sec in total

First Response

330 ms

Resources Loaded

12.1 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

About Website

Welcome to igm.no homepage info - get ready to check IGM best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about igm.no

IGM er et kompetansesenter innen digital kommunikasjon. Kurs og høgskole studier i Adobe programmer, markedsføring, interaksjonsdesign, video, web, design og design thinking.

Visit igm.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Igm.no page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 14.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

igm.no performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,110 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

igm.no

330 ms

igm.no

5137 ms

js

105 ms

style.min.css

164 ms

style.css

254 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Igm.no, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Igm.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (35%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Igm.no main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 132.7 kB

  • Original 162.3 kB
  • After minification 157.5 kB
  • After compression 29.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 82.6 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 383.0 kB

  • Original 694.0 kB
  • After minification 673.2 kB
  • After compression 311.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 383.0 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 871.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 233.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igm.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 871.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (76%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

igm.no accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

igm.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

igm.no SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igm.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igm.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IGM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: