Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

inbudget.net

inBudget - A Free Personal Finance Management App, Like it Should Be

Page Load Speed

21 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

20.4 sec

Page Rendered

567 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing InBudget content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inbudget.net

Take control of your personal finances like never before. Organize, analyze, and plan your money for the future. Create budgets anytime, anywhere.

Visit inbudget.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Inbudget.net page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 20.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inbudget.net performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.221

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inbudget.net

52 ms

inbudget.net

2045 ms

fira.css

2201 ms

layers.min.css

2373 ms

font-awesome.min.css

2516 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Inbudget.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Inbudget.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 46.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Inbudget.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 971.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 30.7 kB

  • Original 38.3 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 971.1 kB
  • After minification 963.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. InBudget images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 205.1 kB
  • After minification 205.1 kB
  • After compression 200.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 27.2 kB
  • After minification 27.2 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inbudget.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (27%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of InBudget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

inbudget.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inbudget.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

inbudget.net SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inbudget.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inbudget.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of InBudget. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: