Access indianaresurfacing.com. Indianapolis Bathtub Resurfacing | Indiana Resurfacing

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

indianaresurfacing.com

49 ms

www.indianaresurfacing.com

791 ms

js

71 ms

style.min.css

31 ms

all.min.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Indianaresurfacing.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Jumpzo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Jumpzo.com.

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Indianaresurfacing.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

Original 58.1 kB
After minification 58.1 kB
After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 167.3 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Indiana Resurfacing needs image optimization as it can save up to 167.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

Original 161.5 kB
After minification 161.5 kB
After compression 160.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 22 B

Original 65.3 kB
After minification 65.3 kB
After compression 65.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indianaresurfacing.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indiana Resurfacing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.