Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

inext.com

Travel Protection with iNext | Travel Protection Plan

Page Load Speed

879 ms in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

641 ms

Page Rendered

130 ms

About Website

Welcome to inext.com homepage info - get ready to check INext best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about inext.com

The best international travel protection for students, groups, and families. Select levels of coverage that include health, 24-hour support, and more.

Visit inext.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inext.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 771 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inext.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inext.com

108 ms

www.inext.com

83 ms

www.inext.com

37 ms

main.css

29 ms

font-awesome.min.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Inext.com, 30% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

712.1 kB

After Optimization

650.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Inext.com main page is 712.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 566.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 33.3 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 28 B

  • Original 566.5 kB
  • After minification 566.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INext images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 77.1 kB
  • After minification 77.1 kB
  • After compression 63.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INext. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

inext.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

inext.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

inext.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inext.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of INext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: