Access inriver.com. inriver PIM Software - #1 Product Information Management Solution

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value43,620 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value59.2 s

0/100

10%

inriver.com

1002 ms

font-awesome.min.css

434 ms

css

25 ms

bootstrap.min.css

665 ms

video-js.css

577 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Inriver.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Kodexe-dev.actonservice.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Inriver.com.

Content Size

11.5 MB

After Optimization

9.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Inriver.com main page is 11.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 46.3 kB

Original 56.7 kB
After minification 42.5 kB
After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

Original 10.7 MB
After minification 8.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inriver needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 379.0 kB

Original 541.7 kB
After minification 509.3 kB
After compression 162.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 379.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 184.4 kB

Original 224.8 kB
After minification 199.9 kB
After compression 40.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inriver.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 184.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inriver. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.