Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

insm.de

INSM - Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

363 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Visit insm.de now to see the best up-to-date INSM content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about insm.de

Jetzt handeln, bevor es zu spät ist.

Visit insm.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Insm.de page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

insm.de performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

insm.de

363 ms

insm.de

397 ms

insm

671 ms

7015c8c4ac5ff815b57530b221005fc6.css

187 ms

insm.min.css

405 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Insm.de, 3% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiefirst.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (822 ms) belongs to the original domain Insm.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 239.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Insm.de main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 84.7 kB

  • Original 98.1 kB
  • After minification 77.8 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.3 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 155.1 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INSM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 42 B

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 35.4 kB
  • After compression 35.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (17%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INSM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

insm.de accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

insm.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

insm.de SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Insm.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Insm.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INSM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: