Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

interfor.com

Interfor | Quality Lumber | Moving Ahead in Bold Directions

Page Load Speed

21.6 sec in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

21.3 sec

Page Rendered

270 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Interfor content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interfor.com

We are Interfor. We build value though supplying high quality lumber products with sound environmental, social and governance practices. Come and take a look.

Visit interfor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interfor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 21.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

interfor.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interfor.com

55 ms

interfor.com

1238 ms

style.min.css

493 ms

search-filter.min.css

334 ms

style.min.css

488 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Interfor.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Interfor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 127.3 kB (1%)

Content Size

13.7 MB

After Optimization

13.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interfor.com main page is 13.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 105.7 kB

  • Original 130.1 kB
  • After minification 110.2 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 13.3 MB
  • After minification 13.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interfor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 235.7 kB
  • After minification 235.7 kB
  • After compression 231.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 48.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interfor.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (30%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

46

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interfor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

interfor.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

interfor.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

interfor.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interfor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interfor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: