Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

internetport.com

Internetport - Easy and Flexible Cloud Solutions

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

333 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

479 ms

About Website

Welcome to internetport.com homepage info - get ready to check Internetport best content for Sweden right away, or after learning these important things about internetport.com

Provider of Web Hosting, Cloud Vps, Dedicated Servers and many more solutions, Internetport are a Swedish Company in operation since 2008.

Visit internetport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Internetport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

internetport.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

internetport.com

333 ms

en

117 ms

gtm.js

74 ms

matomo.js

673 ms

689.50f6452e.css

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Internetport.com, 33% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 5% (2 requests) were made to Matomo.internetport.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (831 ms) relates to the external source Matomo.internetport.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

751.1 kB

After Optimization

675.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Internetport.com main page is 751.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 324.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 52.1 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.2 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 324.1 kB
  • After minification 324.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Internetport images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 311.7 kB
  • After minification 311.7 kB
  • After compression 288.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 174 B

  • Original 56.0 kB
  • After minification 56.0 kB
  • After compression 55.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internetport.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (47%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internetport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

internetport.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

internetport.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

internetport.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internetport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Internetport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Internetport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: