Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

interpreterpaul.com

Paolo Cappelli | @interpreterpaul | Conference Interpreter

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

368 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

182 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Interpreter Paul content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interpreterpaul.com

Visit interpreterpaul.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interpreterpaul.com page load time and found that the first response time was 368 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interpreterpaul.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.086

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interpreterpaul.com

368 ms

www.interpreterpaul.com

727 ms

analytics.js

27 ms

shareaholic.js

65 ms

all.min.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Interpreterpaul.com, 64% (57 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (967 ms) relates to the external source Interpretetraduttore.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 182.9 kB (35%)

Content Size

515.4 kB

After Optimization

332.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interpreterpaul.com main page is 515.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 208.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 177.2 kB

  • Original 208.9 kB
  • After minification 206.3 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 58.8 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interpreter Paul images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 191.6 kB
  • After minification 191.6 kB
  • After compression 189.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 56.1 kB
  • After minification 56.1 kB
  • After compression 52.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interpreterpaul.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (83%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interpreter Paul. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

interpreterpaul.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interpreterpaul.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

interpreterpaul.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interpreterpaul.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interpreterpaul.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interpreter Paul. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: