Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

intype.info

イソフラボン摂取の利点

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

158 ms

About Website

Visit intype.info now to see the best up-to-date Intype content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about intype.info

イソフラボンを摂取する利点は数多くあります。病気予防や健康の為にも正しく把握しておかないとなりません。改めて魅力や素晴らしい効果を確認しておきましょう!

Visit intype.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Intype.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intype.info performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intype.info

1282 ms

common.css

170 ms

layout.css

337 ms

design.css

338 ms

mobile.css

340 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Intype.info and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Intype.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.9 kB (14%)

Content Size

84.9 kB

After Optimization

73.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Intype.info main page is 84.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 33.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 301 B

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intype images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 386 B

  • Original 33.1 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intype.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (33%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intype. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

intype.info accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

intype.info best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intype.info SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intype.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Intype.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intype. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: