Access irontonvision.com. Eye Doctor in Ironton, OH

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.7 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.429

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

irontonvision.com

120 ms

choices.min.css

22 ms

intl-tel-input.min.css

42 ms

richtext.min.css

58 ms

content.min.css

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Irontonvision.com, 32% (25 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (9 requests) were made to Files.hellonetcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (579 ms) relates to the external source Elocallink.tv.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

426.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Irontonvision.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 144.1 kB

Original 176.2 kB
After minification 173.6 kB
After compression 32.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

Original 20.6 kB
After minification 15.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ironton Vision needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 773.4 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 607.6 kB
After compression 317.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 773.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 67.7 kB

Original 128.7 kB
After minification 112.0 kB
After compression 61.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irontonvision.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ironton Vision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.