Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

irp.cl

Centro Radiológico Providencia

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

74 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

870 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Irp content for Chile. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about irp.cl

Resonancia magnetica, resonancia magnetica rodilla, tac, laboratorios medicos, laboratorio clinico, tomografía, ecocardiograma, Examenes Fonasa, Ecografía, Scanner

Visit irp.cl

Key Findings

We analyzed Irp.cl page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

irp.cl performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.1 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

irp.cl

74 ms

irp.cl

886 ms

js

74 ms

public.css

70 ms

auto-generated-wptwa.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Irp.cl, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Irp.cl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 514.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Irp.cl main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 349.2 kB

  • Original 402.3 kB
  • After minification 397.9 kB
  • After compression 53.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 349.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 165.3 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Irp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (57%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

41

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

irp.cl accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

irp.cl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

irp.cl SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irp.cl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Irp.cl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Irp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: