Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

irph.org

IRPH. Indices de Referencia de Prestamos Hipotecarios.

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

477 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

295 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing IRPH content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about irph.org

Bienvenidos a IRPH. El blog inmobiliario que analiza la actualidad del mercado de la vivienda y los Indices de Referencia de Prestamos Hipotecarios.

Visit irph.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Irph.org page load time and found that the first response time was 477 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

irph.org performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,020 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.267

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

irph.org

477 ms

style.css

172 ms

style-font.css

213 ms

tfg_style.css

300 ms

style.css

246 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Irph.org, 6% (3 requests) were made to Financialred.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (957 ms) belongs to the original domain Irph.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 311.0 kB (55%)

Content Size

569.7 kB

After Optimization

258.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Irph.org main page is 569.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 329.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 45.4 kB
  • After minification 43.1 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 126.8 kB
  • After minification 117.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IRPH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 208.2 kB

  • Original 329.5 kB
  • After minification 314.3 kB
  • After compression 121.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 58.7 kB

  • Original 68.1 kB
  • After minification 51.4 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irph.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (53%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IRPH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

irph.org accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

irph.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

irph.org SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irph.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Irph.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IRPH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: