Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

irv2.com

iRV2 Forums

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

About Website

Visit irv2.com now to see the best up-to-date IRV2 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about irv2.com

iRV2 is the friendliest online RV Forum Community where motorhome and travel trailer owners meet to discuss all aspects of RV ownership. Come be part of our RV forum community today!

Visit irv2.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Irv2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

irv2.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,320 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.152

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

irv2.com

26 ms

irv2.com

52 ms

www.irv2.com

52 ms

364 ms

gtm.js

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Irv2.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Rvliving.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (867 ms) relates to the external source Rvliving.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 199.5 kB (21%)

Content Size

959.8 kB

After Optimization

760.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Irv2.com main page is 959.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 635.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 198.8 kB

  • Original 240.8 kB
  • After minification 240.7 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 202 B

  • Original 635.7 kB
  • After minification 635.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IRV2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 500 B

  • Original 81.3 kB
  • After minification 81.3 kB
  • After compression 80.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (36%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

55

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IRV2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

irv2.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[accesskey] values are not unique

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

irv2.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

irv2.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irv2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Irv2.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IRV2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: