Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

iterate.in

IT Solutions Company | Customized Applications & Software Development Services

Page Load Speed

18.3 sec in total

First Response

6.8 sec

Resources Loaded

10.6 sec

Page Rendered

861 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Iterate content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about iterate.in

Iterate India Pvt. Ltd. IT Solutions Provider Company. Customize Applications & Software Development Services & Solution in India. Packaged Software Products, Technical Support & Training Services in ...

Visit iterate.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Iterate.in page load time and found that the first response time was 6.8 sec and then it took 11.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iterate.in performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,130 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iterate.in

6822 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

736 ms

main.min.css

760 ms

css

34 ms

menu-animation.min.css

519 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Iterate.in, 19% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Iterate.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 281.4 kB (54%)

Content Size

522.6 kB

After Optimization

241.2 kB

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Iterate.in main page is 522.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 352.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 175.4 kB

  • Original 352.4 kB
  • After minification 177.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Iterate needs image optimization as it can save up to 175.4 kB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 64.9 kB

  • Original 120.1 kB
  • After minification 117.8 kB
  • After compression 55.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 50.1 kB
  • After minification 40.0 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iterate.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (53%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Iterate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

iterate.in accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

iterate.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

iterate.in SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iterate.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Iterate.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Iterate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: