Access jamesblakeinternet.com. Web Design London - Website Design & Web Development in London, UK

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

jamesblakeinternet.com

341 ms

www.jbidigital.co.uk

615 ms

admin.css

35 ms

style.css

185 ms

theme-mode.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jamesblakeinternet.com, 85% (39 requests) were made to Jbidigital.co.uk and 4% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (615 ms) relates to the external source Jbidigital.co.uk.

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Jamesblakeinternet.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 51.2 kB

Original 61.1 kB
After minification 46.9 kB
After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 473.5 kB

Original 2.2 MB
After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jamesblakeinternet needs image optimization as it can save up to 473.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 40 B

Original 39.7 kB
After minification 39.7 kB
After compression 39.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

Original 33.8 kB
After minification 33.8 kB
After compression 29.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesblakeinternet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesblakeinternet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.