Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

jamesmarshlaw.com

Helping survivors rebuild their lives with dignity & respect

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

161 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

665 ms

About Website

Visit jamesmarshlaw.com now to see the best up-to-date Jamesmarshlaw content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamesmarshlaw.com

Representing victims of sexual abuse, sextortion, online exploitation, social media harms, campus sexual assault, child pornography (CSAM), and discrimination.

Visit jamesmarshlaw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamesmarshlaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamesmarshlaw.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,200 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamesmarshlaw.com

161 ms

www.jamesmarshlaw.com

451 ms

js

68 ms

css2

59 ms

wpo-minify-header-b4e1179d.min.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Jamesmarshlaw.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) belongs to the original domain Jamesmarshlaw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 536.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jamesmarshlaw.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 183.1 kB

  • Original 235.3 kB
  • After minification 234.4 kB
  • After compression 52.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamesmarshlaw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 325.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 699.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 325.4 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 183.1 kB
  • After minification 183.1 kB
  • After compression 159.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesmarshlaw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (82%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesmarshlaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

jamesmarshlaw.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

jamesmarshlaw.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

jamesmarshlaw.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesmarshlaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesmarshlaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jamesmarshlaw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: