Access jdale.net. Jamie Dale Photography - Fashion - Editorial

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

jdale.net

55 ms

www.jdale.net

880 ms

css2

33 ms

css

55 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 131 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Jdale.net, 76% (100 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (880 ms) belongs to the original domain Jdale.net.

Content Size

510.4 kB

After Optimization

378.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Jdale.net main page is 510.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 304.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 91.1 kB

Original 104.0 kB
After minification 77.8 kB
After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 536 B

Original 4.5 kB
After minification 4.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, J Dale needs image optimization as it can save up to 536 B or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

Original 304.6 kB
After minification 304.6 kB
After compression 294.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 30.3 kB

Original 97.4 kB
After minification 97.3 kB
After compression 67.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jdale.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of J Dale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.