Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

jellyent.com

Page Load Speed

730 ms in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

323 ms

Page Rendered

302 ms

About Website

Visit jellyent.com now to see the best up-to-date Jellyent content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jellyent.com

Visit jellyent.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jellyent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 625 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jellyent.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jellyent.com

105 ms

parking.2.98.0.js

5 ms

_fd

172 ms

caf.js

85 ms

px.gif

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Jellyent.com, 17% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (172 ms) belongs to the original domain Jellyent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 600 B (1%)

Content Size

56.5 kB

After Optimization

55.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jellyent.com main page is 56.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 55.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 424 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 957 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 424 B or 31% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 176 B

  • Original 55.1 kB
  • After minification 55.1 kB
  • After compression 55.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jellyent. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

jellyent.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

jellyent.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

jellyent.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jellyent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Jellyent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jellyent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: