Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

jetport.com

Private Jet Service | Private Jet Rental | Jetport

Page Load Speed

914 ms in total

First Response

65 ms

Resources Loaded

334 ms

Page Rendered

515 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jetport content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jetport.com

From last minute business and world class excursions to private aircraft management, Jetport is your GTA based private travel solution.

Visit jetport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jetport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 849 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jetport.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jetport.com

65 ms

jetport.com

48 ms

email-icon.png

207 ms

header-phone-icon.png

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jetport.com, 50% (2 requests) were made to Cdn-dbend.nitrocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (207 ms) relates to the external source Cdn-dbend.nitrocdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 117.3 kB (74%)

Content Size

158.0 kB

After Optimization

40.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Jetport.com main page is 158.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 157.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 117.2 kB

  • Original 157.5 kB
  • After minification 157.5 kB
  • After compression 40.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 39 B

  • Original 544 B
  • After minification 505 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jetport images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jetport. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

jetport.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

jetport.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jetport.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jetport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jetport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jetport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: