4.1 sec in total
33 ms
3.3 sec
838 ms
Click here to check amazing JFrog content for Israel. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jfrog.org
The JFrog Platform gives you an end-to-end pipeline to control the flow of your binaries from build to production. Power your software updates to the edge
Visit jfrog.orgWe analyzed Jfrog.org page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
jfrog.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value23,260 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value29.8 s
0/100
10%
33 ms
1071 ms
18 ms
21 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 554 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jfrog.org, 88% (486 requests) were made to Jfrog.com and 3% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Jfrog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.4 MB (43%)
7.9 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Jfrog.org main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.5 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, JFrog needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 965.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 965.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 453.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jfrog.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 453.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 121 (23%)
529
408
The browser has sent 529 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JFrog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
jfrog.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
jfrog.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
jfrog.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jfrog.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jfrog.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
jfrog.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JFrog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: