Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

jgeoff.com

J Geoff Malta ~ Web Development & Video Editing ~ Short Films

Page Load Speed

21.4 sec in total

First Response

484 ms

Resources Loaded

20.7 sec

Page Rendered

218 ms

About Website

Welcome to jgeoff.com homepage info - get ready to check J Geoff best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about jgeoff.com

Homepage of J Geoff Malta, Webmaster - audio, video, multimedia, web sites

Visit jgeoff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jgeoff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 484 ms and then it took 20.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

jgeoff.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,860 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jgeoff.com

484 ms

show_ads.js

19 ms

earnMoneyBlue_120x60.gif

303 ms

allposters.gif

20328 ms

gd

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Jgeoff.com, 17% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 17% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source .

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 29.0 kB (35%)

Content Size

82.0 kB

After Optimization

53.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Jgeoff.com main page is 82.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 47.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 264 B

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. J Geoff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 47.0 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB
  • After compression 35.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (25%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of J Geoff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jgeoff.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jgeoff.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jgeoff.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jgeoff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jgeoff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of J Geoff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: