Access joelsiddall.co.uk. Web Design Sheffield | Freelance User Experience Designer

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

joelsiddall.co.uk

140 ms

joelsiddall.co.uk

313 ms

style.css

179 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

242 ms

jquery-ui-1.9.1.custom.min.js

194 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Joelsiddall.co.uk, 8% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (560 ms) belongs to the original domain Joelsiddall.co.uk.

Content Size

111.5 kB

After Optimization

81.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Joelsiddall.co.uk main page is 111.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 68.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

Original 2.3 kB
After minification 2.0 kB
After compression 894 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 267 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

Original 39.5 kB
After minification 22.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joelsiddall needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

Original 68.5 kB
After minification 67.5 kB
After compression 57.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 345 B

Original 1.1 kB
After minification 1.1 kB
After compression 804 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joelsiddall.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 345 B or 30% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joelsiddall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.