Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

johnsonfloorcoveringct.com

Flooring store in Old Saybrook | Johnson Floor Covering

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Johnson Floor Covering Ct content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johnsonfloorcoveringct.com

Welcome to Johnson Floor Covering! The most TRUSTED source for professional flooring services in Old Saybrook, Durham, Madison, Old Lyme, Niantic, & more!

Visit johnsonfloorcoveringct.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Johnsonfloorcoveringct.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

johnsonfloorcoveringct.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,730 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

johnsonfloorcoveringct.com

46 ms

www.johnsonfloorcoveringct.com

298 ms

ec58dc1ec78ecb61.css

101 ms

20fdbe689c5c2e99.css

99 ms

4f7b2579-b016f21617ff9be3.js

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Johnsonfloorcoveringct.com, 32% (16 requests) were made to Clientassets.web.broadlume.com and 26% (13 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (653 ms) relates to the external source Clientassets.web.broadlume.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 511.0 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

567.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Johnsonfloorcoveringct.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 579.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 510.7 kB

  • Original 579.2 kB
  • After minification 578.6 kB
  • After compression 68.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 510.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 276 B

  • Original 303.6 kB
  • After minification 303.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnson Floor Covering Ct images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 44 B

  • Original 181.9 kB
  • After minification 181.9 kB
  • After compression 181.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4 B

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 13.3 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnsonfloorcoveringct.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (55%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnson Floor Covering Ct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

johnsonfloorcoveringct.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

johnsonfloorcoveringct.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

johnsonfloorcoveringct.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnsonfloorcoveringct.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnsonfloorcoveringct.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Johnson Floor Covering Ct. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: