Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

journaljammr.com

LINK SLOT GACOR HARI INI SITUS LUCKY JACKPOT SLOT888 SAMPAI MAXWIN

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

627 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

186 ms

About Website

Visit journaljammr.com now to see the best up-to-date Journaljammr content for Nigeria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about journaljammr.com

Link slot gacor hari ini dari server luar negeri yang terkenal sebagai slot888 lucky jackpot memberikan akses terbaru untuk member setia JOKER768 di permainan slot gacor maxwin. Main dan rasakan kemen...

Visit journaljammr.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Journaljammr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 627 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

journaljammr.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

journaljammr.com

627 ms

JAMMR

1210 ms

polyfill.min.js

100 ms

tex-mml-chtml.js

49 ms

js

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Journaljammr.com, 20% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Journaljammr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 381.2 kB (74%)

Content Size

512.9 kB

After Optimization

131.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Journaljammr.com main page is 512.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 296.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.0 kB

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 115.1 kB

  • Original 192.3 kB
  • After minification 192.3 kB
  • After compression 77.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.1 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 248.1 kB

  • Original 296.8 kB
  • After minification 294.3 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journaljammr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 248.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (78%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journaljammr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

journaljammr.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

journaljammr.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

journaljammr.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journaljammr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Journaljammr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Journaljammr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: