Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

json2yaml.com

JSON to YAML Online Converter

Page Load Speed

964 ms in total

First Response

155 ms

Resources Loaded

736 ms

Page Rendered

73 ms

About Website

Visit json2yaml.com now to see the best up-to-date JSON 2 YAML content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about json2yaml.com

Convert JSON to YAML and slim down your data with the json2yaml online editor

Visit json2yaml.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Json2yaml.com page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 809 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

json2yaml.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,730 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.351

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

json2yaml.com

155 ms

148 ms

bairesUIStyles-d168f05d1b3d5e067b2481cc39e955d5.css

31 ms

app-styles.6a39ba958030de97cc3b.css

139 ms

bairesUIComponents-bd1de54540957cbab6d4994164939de4.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Json2yaml.com, 36% (5 requests) were made to Bairesdev.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (201 ms) relates to the external source Tag.clearbitscripts.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.0 kB (18%)

Content Size

27.4 kB

After Optimization

22.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Json2yaml.com main page is 27.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 20.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 7.2 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 28 B

  • Original 20.2 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (75%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JSON 2 YAML. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

json2yaml.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

json2yaml.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

json2yaml.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Json2yaml.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Json2yaml.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JSON 2 YAML. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: