Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

julieannbird.co.uk

Web Hosting, Reseller Hosting & Domain Names from Heart Internet

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

345 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

112 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Julieannbird content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about julieannbird.co.uk

Reseller Hosting, Web Hosting, Dedicated Servers & Domain Names | Heart Internet

Visit julieannbird.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Julieannbird.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 345 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julieannbird.co.uk performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

julieannbird.co.uk

345 ms

styles.css

187 ms

show_ads.js

76 ms

logo.png

216 ms

btn_search.png

429 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Julieannbird.co.uk, 56% (10 requests) were made to Forwards.heartinternet.co.uk and 17% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (429 ms) relates to the external source Customer.heartinternet.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

317.0 kB

After Optimization

275.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Julieannbird.co.uk main page is 317.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 274.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 23.4 kB
  • After minification 21.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julieannbird images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 274.8 kB
  • After minification 274.8 kB
  • After compression 248.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julieannbird.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julieannbird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

julieannbird.co.uk accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

julieannbird.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

julieannbird.co.uk SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julieannbird.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Julieannbird.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Julieannbird. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: