Access jwrapper.com. Remote Support Software by SimpleHelp

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

jwrapper.com

368 ms

sites-buildTime-1570733255.css

166 ms

fancybox-1570733255.css

245 ms

main_style.css

327 ms

css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Jwrapper.com, 27% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) belongs to the original domain Jwrapper.com.

Content Size

103.7 kB

After Optimization

91.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Jwrapper.com main page is 103.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 33.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

Original 14.3 kB
After minification 12.4 kB
After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 281 B

Original 25.9 kB
After minification 25.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jwrapper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 29.6 kB
After minification 29.6 kB
After compression 29.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 467 B

Original 33.9 kB
After minification 33.9 kB
After compression 33.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jwrapper.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jwrapper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.