Access kingsmill.com. Resort, Golf & Custom Homes in Williamsburg VA

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

kingsmill.com

348 ms

css2

62 ms

css2

86 ms

css2

105 ms

mdb.min.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Kingsmill.com, 38% (48 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (736 ms) belongs to the original domain Kingsmill.com.

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Kingsmill.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 86.1 kB

Original 104.1 kB
After minification 86.0 kB
After compression 18.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

Original 2.6 MB
After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kingsmill images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

Original 251.2 kB
After minification 251.2 kB
After compression 203.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 108.2 kB

Original 201.7 kB
After minification 135.6 kB
After compression 93.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kingsmill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.2 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kingsmill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.